Comparison of Parenteral Nutrition Supplemented With L‐Glutamine or Glutamine Dipeptides

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Although glutamine is an important fuel used by the intestinal mucosa and other visceral organs, it is not present in any commercially available parenteral amino acid solution. To compare the effects of L-glutamine with glutamine dipeptides, we studied the effects of each in 8 dogs and 60 Wistar rats. In the dog study, three amino acid solutions were compared: standard commercial amino acid solution (control), alanine-glutamine dipeptide-enriched solution (glutamine 3.4%), and glycine-glutamine dipeptide-enriched solution (glutamine 3.6%). Arterial and venous samples were collected to compare the effects of the three solutions on skeletal muscle amino acid exchange. In the rat study, two studies were undertaken: group 1 rats underwent only central venous catheterization; group 2 rats underwent central venous catheterization and a 50% intestinal resection. Within each group, three different solutions were infused: standard amino acid solution (control), glutamine-enriched (1.5% glutamine) solution, or glutamine dipeptide-enriched (1% glutamine) solution. After 7 days of parenteral nutrition, samples of gut, blood, and muscle were collected for determination of mucosal thickness, villus area, serum amino acid profile, liver and renal function tests, and muscle composition. When glutamine or glutamine-dipeptide solutions were administered, the dogs showed increasing serum glutamine concentrations and enhanced glutamine uptake across the hind leg muscle. Similarly, both groups of rats demonstrated significant differences in serum glutamine levels, nitrogen balance, intestinal mucosa thickness, and villus area. We conclude that both glutamine and glutamine-dipeptide infusions increase serum glutamine concentrations and result in regional tissue effects. Both exerted similar metabolic effects with no apparent complications. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition17:134-141, 1993)