A Cephalometric Study to Compare the Effects of Cervical Traction and Andresen Therapy in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: Part 1—Skeletal Changes
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in British Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 17 (1) , 33-46
- https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.17.1.33
Abstract
Lateral cephalometric radiographs at the beginning of treatment, end of active treatment, and post-treatment of 30 Andresen and 40 cervical traction patients were analysed, and compared with those of a control group of 22 untreated cases. The cervical traction group was divided into a non-extraction group and an extraction of maxillary second molars group. A clinically significant reduction of ANB was achieved, mainly by mandibular changes in the Andresen group and by maxillary changes in the cervical traction groups. Cervical traction was associated with a small distal positioning and anterior downward tipping of the maxilla during treatment. A more favourable sagittal position of the mandible was achieved in the Andresen group compared to the cervical traction groups, particularly the non-extraction group, where a greater transient backward rotation of the mandible occurred during treatment. A significant, but clinically small increase in mandibular body length occurred in Andresen patients compared to the control. However, in both treatment groups this was due to an increase in growth of the vertical ramus. The lower face heights, both anterior and posterior, increased in all groups, with the anterior upper face height also increasing in the cervical traction group.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Skeletal profile changes related to two patterns of activator effectsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1982
- A Study of Class II Division 1 Malocclusions Treated by the Andresen ApplianceBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1981
- Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxillaAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1981
- Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatmentEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1981
- On-line Digitizing: A Basic SystemBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1980
- Distal displacement of the maxilla and the upper first molarAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1979
- Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: An implant studyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1978
- Late Results of Activator-Treatment: A cephalometric studyBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1976
- Morphogenetic response to activator treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1971
- Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division 1 malocclusionsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1967