Radical hysterectomy: Does the type of incision matter?
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 173 (2) , 399-406
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90259-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal HysterectomyGynecologic Oncology, 1993
- To Drain or Not To Drain: A Retrospective Study of Closed-Suction Drainage Following Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic LymphadenectomyGynecologic Oncology, 1993
- Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Morbidity and survival in relation to weight and ageGynecologic Oncology, 1992
- Para-aortic node sampling in small (3-cm or less) stage IB invasive cervical cancerGynecologic Oncology, 1992
- Class II radical hysterectomy shows less morbidity and good treatment efficacy compared to class IIIGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group studyGynecologic Oncology, 1989
- IncisionsClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Surgical Treatment of Women Found to Have Invasive Cervix Cancer at the Time of Total HysterectomyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- Urinary tract fistulas following ligation of the internal iliac artery during radical hysterectomyGynecologic Oncology, 1985
- Perioperative influences on infectious morbidity in radical hysterectomyGynecologic Oncology, 1981