The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literature
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 15 (3) , 174-178
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.017947
Abstract
The "To Err is Human" report published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1999 called for a national effort to make health care safer. Although the report has been widely credited with spawning efforts to study and improve safety in health care, there has been limited objective assessment of its impact. We evaluated the effects of the IOM report on patient safety publications and research awards. We searched MEDLINE to identify English language articles on patient safety and medical errors published between 1 November 1994 and 1 November 2004. Using interrupted time series analyses, changes in the number, type, and subject matter of patient safety publications were measured. We also examined federal (US only) funding of patient safety research awards for the fiscal years 1995-2004. A total of 5514 articles on patient safety and medical errors were published during the 10 year study period. The rate of patient safety publications increased from 59 to 164 articles per 100,000 MEDLINE publications (p<0.001) following the release of the IOM report. Increased rates of publication were observed for all types of patient safety articles. Publications of original research increased from an average of 24 to 41 articles per 100,000 MEDLINE publications after the release of the report (p<0.001), while patient safety research awards increased from 5 to 141 awards per 100,000 federally funded biomedical research awards (p<0.001). The most frequent subject of patient safety publications before the IOM report was malpractice (6% v 2%, p<0.001) while organizational culture was the most frequent subject (1% v 5%, p<0.001) after publication of the report. Publication of the report "To Err is Human" was associated with an increased number of patient safety publications and research awards. The report appears to have stimulated research and discussion about patient safety issues, but whether this will translate into safer patient care remains unknown.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Patient Safety — Five Years after the IOM ReportNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- The Patient Safety Movement Will Help, Not Harm, QualityAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Patient Safety Is Not Enough: Targeting Quality Improvements To Optimize the Health of the PopulationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- The End Of The Beginning: Patient Safety Five Years After ‘To Err Is Human’Health Affairs, 2004
- A Series on Patient SafetyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use researchJournal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2002
- Learning from Our Mistakes: Quality Grand Rounds, a New Case-Based Series on Medical Errors and Patient SafetyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Pushing the profession: how the news media turned patient safety into a priorityQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- The Quality in Australian Health Care StudyThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1995
- The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991