Practice receptionists: poorly trained and taken for granted?
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Vol. 38 (306) , 14-6
Abstract
Seventy receptionists from 20 general practices in Newcastle upon Tyne were interviewed using a questionnaire to determine their demographic and social characteristics, tasks performed and training experience. The majority of receptionists were mature married women working part-time; only 13% had received any formal training. Most receptionists had no career structure and only 9% had ever been given a written job description. Thirty-one per cent of receptionists did not feel appreciated by their general practitioners and more (49%) felt unappreciated by the general public. However, they believed their main function was to help patients. From the description of their work receptionists are clearly integral and essential members of the primary health care team.To achieve the development of primary care services it is likely that practices will need to employ more ancillary staff, and these staff will require more pre-service and in-service training.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE FUTURE OF GENERAL PRACTICE IN NEWCASTLE UPON TYNEThe Lancet, 1986
- Computerised repeat prescriptions: simple system.BMJ, 1985
- The role of the receptionist in general practice: A ‘dragon behind the desk’?Social Science & Medicine, 1985
- Evaluation of a training scheme for receptionists in general practice.1983
- Assessment of receptionists by questions on patient management.BMJ, 1982
- Changes in general practice: do patients benefit?BMJ, 1981
- General practitioners and their staff.1979