Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study
Open Access
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Vol. 15 (5) , 685-690
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00072-x
Abstract
Objective: Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is both safe and effective. Nevertheless, the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) andKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safe and Effective Method of Stabilization for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Beating HeartThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Update on current techniques of myocardial protectionThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegiaThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Cognitive function after open-heart surgery: Are postoperative neuropsychological deficits caused by cardiopulmonary bypass?Neuropsychology Review, 1994
- Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992
- Direct Myocardial Revascularization without Extracorporeal CirculationChest, 1991
- Preservation of interventricular septal function in patients having coronary artery bypass grafts without cardiopulmonary bypassAmerican Heart Journal, 1984