Indications for the multizone bifocal implant
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 16 (2) , 193-197
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80729-8
Abstract
A significant improvement in unaided visual standards may be achieved by switching from a monofocal to a 3M diffractive bifocal implant; however, this results in a loss of clarity, particularly for small print, in some patients. In a prospective study of 55 bifocal eyes and 55 monofocal eyes, best-case analysis showed 81% of 52 eyes with bifocal implants could read J7 with their distance correction compared with 21% of the control eyes and 56% could read J2 with the distance correction compared with 2% of the control eyes; 75% of bifocal eyes could read both 20/40 and J3 without any aid compared with 22% of the control eyes. The 3.5 diopter focus difference in the bifocal lens produced commendable results, with 52% requiring no spectacle reading addition. However, the fact that 17% of bifocal eyes could not read J2 highlights certain drawbacks that are relevant to indications for use.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Experience with the Diffractive Bifocal LensEuropean journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery, 1989
- Clinical results of the multifocal lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1987
- Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakiaAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1981
- Treatment of uniocular aphakia. A comparison of iris clip lenses with hard corneal contact lenses.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1976