Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: A Dichotomy Between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 50 (1) , 73-89
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000104
Abstract
Despite the growing popularity of the term 'organizational learning," writings on the topic have little consensus in terms of definition, perspective, conceptualization, and methodology. This article examines the dichotomy between two main streams of theorizing in the field. The first stream, prescriptive writings on the learning organization, is concerned with the question "How should an organization learn?" Targeting practitioners, these studies are usually based on the authors' consulting experience and seldom follow rigorous research methodologies. They also tend to overgeneralize their theories to all types of organization. Descriptive researches on organizational learning fall in the second stream which tackles the question "How does an organization learn?" These are academic studies striving for scientific rigor. Nevertheless, they often fail to generate useful implications for practitioners. In the final section of the article, brief suggestions are made to integrate the two streams of research.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Resource AccountingManagement Decision, 1994
- Organizational LearningManagement Learning, 1994
- Culture and Organizational LearningJournal of Management Inquiry, 1993
- HOST‐COUNTRY MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOUR AND LEARNING IN CHINESE AND HUNGARIAN JOINT VENTURES*Journal of Management Studies, 1993
- Organizational Learning and Personnel TurnoverOrganization Science, 1992
- Contemporary Challenges in the Study of OrganizationsJournal of Management, 1986
- THINKING ABOUT GOVERNMENT LEARNINGJournal of Management Studies, 1983
- On the Concept of FaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1976
- A Garbage Can Model of Organizational ChoiceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1972
- Organizational Learning: Observations Toward a TheoryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1965