Genetic counseling for familial conditions during pregnancy: an analysis of patient characteristics
- 14 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Genetics
- Vol. 66 (2) , 112-121
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00279.x
Abstract
Reproductive genetic counseling for a familial genetic risk factor preferably takes place before conception. However, of the women with a family history of genetic conditions who attend our department of clinical genetics, about 10-20% attend for the first time during a pregnancy. The current study aims to explore patient-related factors that may affect this late timing of reproductive genetic counseling. Consecutive pregnant (n = 100) and non-pregnant (n = 84) women visiting the department of clinical genetics for a genetic risk factor which was not age related completed a questionnaire immediately prior to the consultation. The questionnaire asked for (a) background characteristics, i.e. socio-demographic, obstetric, and disease characteristics (b) cognitive factors, i.e. initiative of referral, knowledge of the risk factor involved, risk perception, worry, child wish, attitudes toward abortion, and preferred participation in decision making, and (c) reasons for the timing of the consultation and for seeking genetic counseling. Pregnant women appeared to be higher educated, considered their children more often as healthy and were less often affected themselves, as compared to non-pregnant women. They also estimated their chance of having an affected child as lower, and they worried less. Furthermore, the initiative for referral was taken less often by the pregnant woman herself and more often by a medical worker. There were no major differences between the two study groups in knowledge, perceived severity of the risk factor, child wish, attitudes toward abortion, desired participation in decision making, and reasons to seek genetic counseling. Women indicated no specific reasons for their timing of referral for reproductive genetic counseling, e.g. during vs before pregnancy. Our data suggest that this timing of referral is not influenced predominantly by the women's level of knowledge. Rather, women's estimation of genetic risks and their degree of worry, which may be in accordance with the actual risk figures, seem to play a role in seeking genetic counseling. Although further studies are required, a more active role of health care providers seems warranted if we want to prevent genetic counseling for familial genetic conditions during pregnancy as much as possiblKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in primary care: evaluation of a project in South Wales The South Wales Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening Research TeamClinical Genetics, 2008
- Utilization of genetic counseling by parents of a child or fetus with congenital malformation in North-East ItalyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 2003
- Possible consequences of applying guidelines to healthy women with a family history of breast cancerEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- The genetic family history as a risk assessment tool in internal medicineGenetics in Medicine, 2003
- Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer at the Bedside: Role of the Medical OncologistJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Referral for genetic counseling after the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly in the Northern NetherlandsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 2002
- Participation in preconceptional carrier couple screening: characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge of both partnersJournal of Medical Genetics, 2001
- Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: Test acceptance and one year follow-upAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- The uptake and acceptability to patients of cystic fibrosis carrier testing offered in pregnancy by the GP.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- Psychological and social impact of carrier screening for cystic fibrosis among pregnant women - a pilot studyClinical Genetics, 1996