Hypothesis versus significance testing for controlled clinical trials: A dialogue
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 9 (3) , 201-211
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780090302
Abstract
The mathematical formulations of Neyman‐Pearson hypothesis testing and the Fisherian concept of significance tests are examined as alternative ways of applying statistical models to data from clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conditional Confidence Statements and Confidence EstimatorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977
- Upper and Lower Probabilities Generated by a Random Closed IntervalThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1968
- On the Foundations of Statistical InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- Sur la vérification des hypothèses statistiques composéesBulletin de la Société Mathématiques de France, 1935
- On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive SelectionJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1934
- The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a prioriMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1933
- IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypothesesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1933
- III. The influence of rainfall on the yield of wheat at RothamstedPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character, 1925
- Studies in crop variation. II. The manurial response of different potato varietiesThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1923
- Studies in crop variation. I. An examination of the yield of dressed grain from BroadbalkThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1921