Are higher doses of nicotine replacement more effective for smoking cessation?
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Vol. 1 (2) , 169-174
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14622299050011281
Abstract
This study determined whether higher dose nicotine patches are more efficacious than lower dose patches among heavy smokers. A randomized double-blind study compared 0, 21, 35, and 42 mg/day of a 24-h patch in 1039 smokers (≥30 cigarettes/day) at 12 clinical sites in the USA and one in Australia. Daily patches were used for 6 weeks followed by tapering over the next 10 weeks. Weekly group therapy occurred. Biochemically validated self-reported quit rates at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-cessation were measured. Quit rates were dose-related at all follow-ups (p<0.01). Continuous, biochemically verified abstinence rates for the 0, 21, 35, and 42 mg doses at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 16, 24, 30, and 39%. At 6 months, the rates were 13, 20, 20, and 26%. Among the 11 sites with 12 month follow-up (n = 879), the quit rates were 7, 13, 9, and 19%. In post-hoc tests, none of the active doses were significantly different from each other at any follow-up. The rates of dropouts due to adverse events for 0, 21, 35, and 42 mg were 3, 1, 3, and 6% (p = n.s.). Our results are similar to most prior smaller studies; i.e., in heavy smokers higher doses increase quit rates slightly. Longer durations of treatment may be necessary to show greater advantages from higher doses.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Higher dosage nicotine patches increase one‐year smoking cessation rates: results from the European CEASE trialEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1999
- Cardiovascular Toxicity of Nicotine: Implications for Nicotine Replacement Therapy 11All editorial decisions for this article, including selection of referees, were made by a Guest Editor. This policy applies to all articles with authors from the University of California San Francisco.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Assessing the generalizability of smoking studiesAddiction, 1997
- Importance of baseline cotinine plasma values in smoking cessation: results from a double-blind study with nicotine patchEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1996
- Combined Use of Nicotine Patch and Gum in Smoking Cessation: A Placebo-Controlled Clinical TrialPreventive Medicine, 1995
- Meta‐analytic review of the efficacy of smoking cessation interventionsDrug and Alcohol Review, 1994
- Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessationThe Lancet, 1994
- Does nicotine replacement therapy work?Addiction, 1993
- Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation: Unvalidated assumptions, anomalies, and suggestions for future research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993
- Effect of Nicotine Chewing Gum in Combination with Group Counseling on the Cessation of SmokingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988