Common Myths About Electrosurgery
Open Access
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery
- Vol. 123 (4) , 450-455
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.109758
Abstract
The electrosurgery device market is lucrative and highly competitive. Several device manufacturers exist, and many creative techniques are used to differentiate products. Some device manufacturers make claims in marketing campaigns that are difficult to reconcile with the laws of physics or basic physiology. The variety of claims may be confusing to surgeons desiring to purchase new electrosurgical products. Understanding a few basic principles of electrosurgery physics can allow a surgeon to be a more informed consumer of electrosurgical products. This article discusses the basic physics of electrosurgery and then addresses several common misconceptions about electrosurgery and electrosurgical devices. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:450-5.)Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental Generation Of A Steady-state Glow Discharge At Atmospheric PressurePublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2005
- Radiofrequency Volumetric Tissue Reduction for Treatment of Turbinate Hypertrophy: A Pilot StudyOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1998
- Radiofrequency Volumetric Reduction of the TongueChest, 1997
- Electrocautery Burns and Operator IgnoranceOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1996
- Sterilization of contaminated matter with an atmospheric pressure plasmaIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 1996
- Outpatient cautery‐assisted uvulopalatoplastyThe Laryngoscope, 1995
- Comparison of Skin Necrosis in Rats by Using a New Microneedle Electrocautery, Standard-Size Needle Electrocautery, and the Shaw Hemostatic ScalpelAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1993
- Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1992
- The principles of surgical diathermy and its limitationsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1962