The loss of local control over prison administration
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 5 (3) , 457-473
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828800089821
Abstract
The present analysis argues that state governments lack the capacity to administer prisons, and that this lack of capacity explains the loss of local control over prisons more fully than does overcrowding or judicial activism. Administrative deficiencies among state governments include a lack of commitment and ability to comply with federal court orders, an unwillingness to institute certifiable grievance systems, and a lack of legal defense expertise. Characteristics of state governments which help to explain administrative deficiencies also are identified. Among these are a lack of gubernatorial power, high degrees of administrative autonomy and instability, and failures to treat prisons as limited resources. It is concluded that political development is required before state governments can regain control over prison administration.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- ISSUES AND MISCONCEPTIONS IN PRISONER LITIGATION: A CRITICAL VIEW*Criminology, 1986
- PRISON GUARDS AND THE USE OF PHYSICAL COERCION AS A MECHANISM OF PRISONER CONTROL*Criminology, 1986
- Rethinking Prisoner Litigation: Some Preliminary Distinctions Between Habeas Corpus and Civil RightsThe Prison Journal, 1985
- Prisoners and Their Endangered RightsThe Prison Journal, 1985
- Prison Overcrowding and the LawThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1985
- An Approach to the Allocation of Scarce Imprisonment ResourcesCrime & Delinquency, 1983
- Do Judges Determine Budget Decisions? Federal Court Decisions in Prison Reform and State Spending for CorrectionsPublic Administration Review, 1983
- The Governor as Chief AdministratorPublic Administration Review, 1983
- Political Development and Political DecayWorld Politics, 1965