Motor Vehicle-Related Cardiac and Aortic Injuries Differ From Other Thoracic Injuries
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Vol. 62 (6) , 1462-1467
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000221271.76676.2e
Abstract
Traumatic cardiac and thoracic aortic injuries are hypothesized to result from rapid deceleration of occupants during a motor vehicle crash. The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for motor vehicle-related cardiac and thoracic aortic (HTA) injury using the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network (CIREN) database. CIREN data were used to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between occupants with HTA injury and occupants with thoracic injury other than the heart or aorta (non-HTA). Occupant variables (restraint use, airbag deployment, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, concomitant injuries, driver versus passenger status, height, and comorbidity) and crash variables (principal direction of force, change in velocity, vehicle crush, intrusion, and vehicle type) were compared for these two groups. Odds ratios were used to quantify the potential risk factors for HTA injury compared with non-HTA injury. There were 168 occupants with an HTA injury and 731 with a non-HTA injury. Greater crash severity (based on vehicle crush and change in velocity), improper safety belt use, and lack of safety belt use were significantly associated with HTA injury. Unrestrained occupants had almost three times the chance of having an HTA injury (odds ratio = 2.86; p < 0.05). For restrained drivers, 41.4% of HTA injuries were caused by vehicle interior components. When not protected by both safety belts and air bags, 45.7% of driver HTA injuries were caused by the steering wheel. For passengers, the vehicle interior (armrests, side interior, and B-pillars) accounted for most HTA injuries regardless of safety system status. More than half of all occupants wearing safety belts who sustained an HTA injury were improperly wearing their safety belts. The high mortality associated with cardiac and aortic injuries supports the need to prevent these injuries from occurring during motor vehicle crashes. These results suggest proper use of safety belts is necessary to prevent cardiac and thoracic aortic injuries. However, other important potential risk factors, such as motor vehicle size and crash severity, might continue to present a challenge to motor vehicle safety professionals.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Change in Velocity and Energy Dissipation on Impact in Motor Vehicle Crashes as a Function of the Direction of Crash: Key Factors in the Production of Thoracic Aortic Injuries, Their Pattern of Associated Injuries and Patient Survival A Crash Injury Research Engineering Network (CIREN) StudyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2004
- Occupant- and Collision-Related Risk Factors for Blunt Thoracic Aorta InjuryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2003
- Rupture of the aorta following road traffic accidents in the United Kingdom 1992–1999. The results of the co-operative crash injury studyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Prediction of injuries to the heart and thoracic aorta in unrestrained driversLegal Medicine, 2002
- Lateral Impact Motor Vehicle CollisionsThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1997
- Isolated Intrathoracic Injury with Air Bag UsePrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 1995
- Blunt diaphragmatic and thoracic aortic rupture: An emerging injury complexThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Car size or car mass: which has greater influence on fatality risk?American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Risk of Fatality from Physical Trauma versus Sex and AgePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1988
- Safety Belt Injury Reduction Related to Crash Severity and Front Seated PositionPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1987