Karl Popper's Philosophy of Biology
- 1 December 1977
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 44 (4) , 638-661
- https://doi.org/10.1086/288772
Abstract
In recent years Sir Karl Popper has been turning his attention more and more towards philosophical problems arising from biology, particularly evolutionary biology. Popper suggests that perhaps neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory is better categorized as a metaphysical research program than as a scientific theory. In this paper it is argued that Popper can draw his conclusions only because he is abysmally ignorant of the current status of biological thought and that Popper's criticisms of biology are without force and his suggestions for its improvement are without need. Also it is suggested that Popper's desire to see scientific theory growth as being in some sense evolutionary may have led him astray about biology. And conversely it is suggested that since his claims about biology are not well taken his analysis of theory growth may well bear reexamination.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- William Whewell and The Argument from DesignMonist, 1977
- The Relationship between Science and Religion in Britain, 1830–1870Church History, 1975
- Charles Darwin's theory of evolution: An analysisJournal of the History of Biology, 1975
- Falsifiable Predictions of Evolutionary TheoryPhilosophy of Science, 1973
- AN EXPLANATION FOR COPE'S RULEEvolution, 1973
- Are there laws in biology?Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1970
- The bases of conflict in biological explanationJournal of the History of Biology, 1969
- The Concept of EvolutionPhilosophy, 1965
- Animal Species and EvolutionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1963
- Evolution and the theory of gamesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1961