Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (7) , 1993-1998
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000070401.65534.f9
Abstract
Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H(2)O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Paw(p)/P(100) congruent with 1.1; where Paw(p) is peak airway pressure and P(100) is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Paw(p) of 42.8 +/- 3.1, 43.5 +/- 2.6, and 46.2 +/- 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Paw(p)/P(100) - index of overdistension: 1.17 +/- 0.2, 1.06 +/- 0.1, and 1.19 +/- 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 +/- 14 mins and 60 +/- 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 +/- 3 mins, p <.001). These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to "buy time" in the progression of lung injury.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraalveolar Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor- α Gene during Conventional and High-Frequency VentilationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Mechanical ventilation-induced pulmonary edema. Interaction with previous lung alterations.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Role of Tidal Volume, FRC, and End-inspiratory Volume in the Development of Pulmonary Edema following Mechanical VentilationAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1993
- Lung injury produced by moderate lung overinflation in ratsJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1993
- Acute lung injury from mechanical ventilation at moderately high airway pressuresJournal of Applied Physiology, 1990
- Adverse Effects of Large Tidal Volume and Low PEEP in Canine Acid AspirationAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1990
- Lung Edema Caused by High Peak Inspiratory Pressures in Dogs: Role of Increased Microvascular Filtration Pressure and PermeabilityAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1990
- Barotrauma and microvascular injury in lungs of nonadult rabbitsCritical Care Medicine, 1990
- High Inflation Pressure Pulmonary Edema: Respective Effects of High Airway Pressure, High Tidal Volume, and Positive End-expiratory PressureAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1988