Bacterial contamination of enteral feeding systems due to faulty handling procedures—a comparison of a new system with two established systems
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
- Vol. 11 (4) , 313-321
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-277x.1998.00112.x
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the risks of introducing microbial contamination when assembling and running two commonly used, ready‐to‐hang, enteral feeding systems (Nutrison glass bottles and Steriflo) with a newly introduced system (Nutrison pack).Methods: The nutrient container tops of all systems were deliberately touched during assembly by a researcher wearing gloves contaminated with Klebsiella aerogenes. After touching, half the containers were immediately connected to giving sets, the other half were disinfected using alcohol wipes before connection to the giving sets. Systems were run for 24 h, with a change of nutrient container at 12 h for the Steriflo (2×1000 ml), Nutrison pack (2×1000 ml) and Nutrison glass bottles (2×500 ml), and at 6 h for the Nutrison glass bottles (4×500 ml). Feed samples for microbiological analysis were taken from feed in the systems at the 0 h assembly, and from residual feed in all discarded nutrient containers. Each protocol was repeated five times.Results: The percentage of feed samples in which K. aerogenes was detected reduced significantly from 68% for non‐disinfected Nutrison glass bottles changed every 6 h, to 59% after disinfection, and from 51% to 0% after disinfection of Steriflo systems (Mann–Whitney, P< 0.05). For Nutrison glass bottles changed every 12 h the fall from 51% with no disinfection to 49% after disinfection was not significant (Mann–Whitney, P< 0.05). Nutrison packs were not disinfected and yet K. aerogenes was only detected in 2% of feed samples. This rate of contamination was significantly less than that for all the other non‐disinfected systems (Mann–Whitney, P< 0.05).Conclusion: The results show a reduction in the incidence of bacterial contamination of the feed samples when systems were disinfected subsequent to being exposed to faulty handling procedures, thus supporting manufacturers recommendations to disinfect systems during assembly. The results particularly highlight the important role played by system design in reducing the levels and incidence of bacterial contamination of enteral tube feeds.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endogenous bacterial contamination of enteral tube feeding systems during administration of feeds to hospital patientsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1995
- Risks of microbiological contamination of enteral feeds during the set up of enteral feeding systemsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1993
- Bacterial contamination of enteral feeds and feeding systemsClinical Nutrition, 1993
- Limiting Bacterial Contamination of Enteral Nutrient Solutions: 6‐Year History With Reduction of Contamination at Two InstitutionsNutrition in Clinical Practice, 1992
- Enteral hyperalimentation as a source of nosocomial infectionJournal of Hospital Infection, 1990
- The effect of handling procedures on bacterial contamination of enteral feeds—importance of design of enteral feeding setsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1988
- Microbial growth in clinically used enteral delivery systemsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1986
- The potential of Escherichia coli in enteral feeds to cause food poisoning: a study under simulated ward conditionsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1984
- Microbial Contamination of Enteral Feeding Solutions in a Community HospitalJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1983