Abstract
The frequency of de novo rearrangements at amniocentesis was determined in 76952 prenatal diagnoses from centres in the United States. Rates for balanced rearrangements are slightly greater than rates previously reported in the newborn, possibly because banding studies were not used in the latter. Rates for unbalanced rearrangements are considerably higher in the amniocentesis data not only because banding was used but also because a substantial loss of abnormal conceptions is to be expected between amniocentesis and birth. The higher frequency of cases with supernumerary markers at amniocentesis is unexplained.A review of 66 apparently balancedde novorearrangements found at amniocentesis revealed evidence of abnormality in five; in four of these the abnormality was noted in the abortus. The number of cases observed is still too small to rule out a risk of abnormality no greater than the usual rate of abnormalities at birth. Abnormalities were detected in 6 of 10 cases with unbalancedde novorearrangements.In 33 cases of non‐familial supernumerary chromosomes 6 (18.2 per cent) showed abnormality. Non‐satellited markers appeared to have a higher rate of abnormality than satellited markers but the difference is not statistically significant.Further studies and improved follow‐up ofde NOVOcases diagnosed at amniocentesis are required.