A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 40 (9) , 1354
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.40.9.1354
Abstract
We compared demographic and clinical features, including outcome defined by a failure time analysis of disability, in 143 patients with a family history of multiple sclerosis (familial MS) compared with 956 patients without such a history (sporadic MS). Patients with familial MS did not differ from those with sporadic MS even when patients with 1st-degree relatives or multiple relatives with MS were considered separately. An intraclass correlation analysis of 13 pairs of affected 1st-degree relatives, both members of which were followed in our clinic, failed to reveal heterogeneity among different families. We were unable to find any support for differences between familial and sporadic MS.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Measurement of Interrater AgreementPublished by Wiley ,2003
- THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: A GEOGRAPHICALLY BASED STUDYBrain, 1989
- The clinical profile of MS in AustraliaNeurology, 1988
- Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in London and Middlesex County, Ontario, CanadaNeurology, 1988
- FAMILIAL VS SPORADIC RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - A COMPARISON OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF 956 PATIENTS1988
- Multiple sclerosis. Updated risks for relativesAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1988
- The contribution of NZW genes to lupus-like disease in (NZB x NZW)F1 mice.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1987
- A Population-Based Study of Multiple Sclerosis in TwinsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- HLA-TYPING IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SIBLING PAIRSThe Lancet, 1982
- On the evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1961