Sample Size, Library Composition, and Genotypic Diversity among Natural Populations of Escherichia coli from Different Animals Influence Accuracy of Determining Sources of Fecal Pollution
Open Access
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Vol. 70 (8) , 4478-4485
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.8.4478-4485.2004
Abstract
A horizontal, fluorophore-enhanced, repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR (rep-PCR) DNA fingerprinting technique (HFERP) was developed and evaluated as a means to differentiate human from animal sources of Escherichia coli. Box A1R primers and PCR were used to generate 2,466 rep-PCR and 1,531 HFERP DNA fingerprints from E. coli strains isolated from fecal material from known human and 12 animal sources: dogs, cats, horses, deer, geese, ducks, chickens, turkeys, cows, pigs, goats, and sheep. HFERP DNA fingerprinting reduced within-gel grouping of DNA fingerprints and improved alignment of DNA fingerprints between gels, relative to that achieved using rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting. Jackknife analysis of the complete rep-PCR DNA fingerprint library, done using Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient, indicated that animal and human isolates were assigned to the correct source groups with an 82.2% average rate of correct classification. However, when only unique isolates were examined, isolates from a single animal having a unique DNA fingerprint, Jackknife analysis showed that isolates were assigned to the correct source groups with a 60.5% average rate of correct classification. The percentages of correctly classified isolates were about 15 and 17% greater for rep-PCR and HFERP, respectively, when analyses were done using the curve-based Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient, rather than the band-based Jaccard algorithm. Rarefaction analysis indicated that, despite the relatively large size of the known-source database, genetic diversity in E. coli was very great and is most likely accounting for our inability to correctly classify many environmental E. coli isolates. Our data indicate that removal of duplicate genotypes within DNA fingerprint libraries, increased database size, proper methods of statistical analysis, and correct alignment of band data within and between gels improve the accuracy of microbial source tracking methods.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deer diet affects ribotype diversity of Escherichia coli for bacterial source trackingWater Research, 2003
- Use of Bifidobacterium dentium as an Indicator of the Origin of Fecal Water PollutionApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003
- Geographical Variation in Ribotype Profiles of Escherichia coli Isolates from Humans, Swine, Poultry, Beef, and Dairy Cattle in FloridaApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003
- Microbial Source Tracking: Current Methodology and Future DirectionsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002
- Potential ofEnterococcus faecalisas a Human Fecal Indicator for Microbial Source TrackingJournal of Environmental Quality, 2002
- Geographic Variability of Escherichia coli Ribotypes from Animals in Idaho and GeorgiaJournal of Environmental Quality, 2002
- Identification of Fecal Escherichia coli from Humans and Animals by RibotypingApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001
- THETHREEDSOFPCR-BASEDGENOMICANALYSISOFPHYTOBACTERIA: Diversity, Detection, and Disease DiagnosisAnnual Review of Phytopathology, 1999
- Identification of Escherichia coli strains from cows with clinical mastitis by serotyping and DNA polymorphism patterns with REP and ERIC primersVeterinary Microbiology, 1995
- The Pearson product‐moment correlation coefficient is better suited for identification of DNA fingerprint profiles than band matching algorithmsElectrophoresis, 1993