What is to be done with radical academic practice?
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Capital & Class
- Vol. 10 (2) , 83-110
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030981688602900105
Abstract
Since the mid 1970s, radical analysis of formal educational institutions has become dominated by a form of academic Marxism or neo-Marxism epitomised in the published work of Apple, Willis, Whitty and Giroux, among others. Such work usually includes ‘Monday morning chapters’ which seek to answer the question: What is to be done? The authors subject this form of theorising to a fundamental critique, seeing it as the product of the forms and processes of bourgeois academia and bourgeois publishing houses. Instead of a self-interested search for a revolutionary agency located in academia, the authors advocate a much greater concern with the specificities of the class struggle and the question of revolutionary practice. They conclude with a discussion of the misreading of Willis's Learning to Labour to illustrate the need for a return to the revolutionary socialist tradition as the basis for a reorientation of Marxist educational theory.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education: A Critical AnalysisHarvard Educational Review, 1983
- Schooling the Smash Street KidsPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1979
- Habermas, Marcuse and the Aufhebung of Science and TechnologyPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 1978
- On Global TheoriesPhilosophy of Science, 1975
- Power: A Radical ViewPublished by Springer Nature ,1974