Itinerants, Iterations and Something In-between
- 27 January 1984
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 14 (1) , 129-132
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400003471
Abstract
To make the theory of games plausible as a representation of behaviour – be it economic or political or social – we must introduce some of the sense of structure and continuity that characterizes our actual lives. Real people do not pair up, play a single game and depart, never to meet again. On the contrary, much of life is made up of continuing interactions with the same small cast of characters. And that, in turn, makes some dramatic differences in the way games are played. Making an unsecured loan to an itinerant is obviously out of the question. But if it is someone who has to deal with you over and over again in a variety of contexts, then the future itself can be your hostage.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Community, Anarchy and LibertyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982
- Collective ActionPublished by Project MUSE ,1982
- The Emergence of Cooperation among EgoistsAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- The Evolution of CooperationScience, 1981
- Effective Choice in the Prisoner's DilemmaJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1980
- I Get By With a Little Help From My FriendsWorld Politics, 1970
- The "end" and "start" effects in iterated Prisoner's DilemmaJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1966
- The Logic of Collective ActionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1965
- Ethical Rules, Expected Values, and Large NumbersEthics, 1965
- Prisoner's DilemmaPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1965