How to lend like mad and make a profit: A micro‐credit paradigm versus the start‐up fund in South Africa
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Development Studies
- Vol. 34 (3) , 44-61
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422520
Abstract
In current debates about micro‐credit, joint‐liability schemes are often viewed as the only viable way to non‐collateralised lending, and are thus seen as almost synonymous with micro‐credit. This article reports about an alternative, non‐participatory approach to micro‐credit. Prompted by the apparent inability of group credit schemes to reign in lending costs, the article sets out the institutional requirements for cheap, ‘mass‐produced’ credit. It argues that such credit can be viable if mechanisms are in place enforcing the self‐selection of potential borrowers and self‐motivation of existing borrowers. The analysis of a ‘mass‐minimalist’ micro‐credit institution from South Africa supports the argument.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The participatory principle in development projects: the costs and benefits of cooperationPublic Administration and Development, 1996
- The design of successful rural financial intermediaries: Evidence from IndonesiaWorld Development, 1996
- Group credit: A means to improve information transfer and loan repayment performanceThe Journal of Development Studies, 1995
- Contemporary Banking TheoryJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1993
- Financial services for microenterprises: Principles and institutionsWorld Development, 1992
- INFORMAL RURAL FINANCE An Aladdin's lamp of informationSociologia Ruralis, 1990
- Issues in Informal FinancePublished by World Bank ,1989