Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: I. Evaluation of measurement errors
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
- Vol. 10 (8) , 357-363
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870100803
Abstract
Several sources of error associated with the measurement of fetal head and abdominal circumferences (HC, AC) were examined using dynamic image ultrasound. Statistically significant systematic intraobserver errors were not seen unless technical differences in the images were present (HC only) and the range for random errors was 4–5% (2 SD) for both measurements. Although differences in the procedures used to acquire images for measurement had some effect on accuracy (HC only), the primary source of variations in measurements made by different investigators was the measurement methods. Different measuring devices gave different results and different investigators used the same devices differently. Under optimal measuring conditions, the interobserver error for experienced investigators was 1.2 (±4.3 SD)% for HC and 2.4 (±1.6 SD)% for AC. Comparison of prenatal and postnatal measurements indicated that there were no systematic differences for HC but for AC, the prenatal measurements were 6% greater. Random differences were ±6% (2 SD) for HC and ±13% (2 SD) for AC.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: II. A critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual ageJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1982
- Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual ageAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Longitudinal studies of fetal growth with the use of dynamic image ultrasonographyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Fetal biparietal diameter: rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurementAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual ageAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1982
- Percentile ranks of sonar fetal abdominal circumference measurementsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- Reliability of fetal anthropometry by ultrasoundjpme, 1980
- ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN THE ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHTBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1975