Clinical and Laboratory Evaluation of Peripheral Prism Glasses for Hemianopia
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Optometry and Vision Science
- Vol. 86 (5) , 492-502
- https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e31819f9e4d
Abstract
Purpose. Homonymous hemianopia (the loss of vision on the same side in each eye) impairs the ability to navigate and walk safely. We evaluated peripheral prism glasses as a low vision optical device for hemianopia in an extended wearing trial. Methods. Twenty-three patients with complete hemianopia (13 right) with neither visual neglect nor cognitive deficit enrolled in the 5-visit study. To expand the horizontal visual field, patients’ spectacles were fitted with both upper and lower Press-On Fresnel prism segments (each 40 prism diopters) across the upper and lower portions of the lens on the hemianopic (“blind”) side. Patients were asked to wear these spectacles as much as possible for the duration of the study, which averaged 9 (range: 5 to 13) weeks. Clinical success (continued wear, indicating perceived overall benefit), visual field expansion, perceived direction, and perceived quality of life were measured. Results. Clinical success: 14 of 21 (67%) patients chose to continue to wear the peripheral prism glasses at the end of the study (two patients did not complete the study for non-vision reasons). At long-term follow-up (8 to 51 months), 5 of 12 (42%) patients reported still wearing the device. Visual field expansion: expansion of about 22° in both the upper and lower quadrants was demonstrated for all patients (binocular perimetry, Goldmann V4e). Perceived direction: two patients demonstrated a transient adaptation to the change in visual direction produced by the peripheral prism glasses. Quality of life: at study end, reduced difficulty noticing obstacles on the hemianopic side was reported. Conclusions. The peripheral prism glasses provided reported benefits (usually in obstacle avoidance) to 2/3 of the patients completing the study, a very good success rate for a vision rehabilitation device. Possible reasons for long-term discontinuation and limited adaptation of perceived direction are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Community-Based Trial of a Peripheral Prism Visual Field Expansion Device for HemianopiaArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 2008
- Long-Term Evaluation of Eccentric Viewing Spectacles in Patients With Bilateral Central ScotomasOptometry and Vision Science, 2006
- Use of prisms for navigation and driving in hemianopic patientsOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2005
- FEASIBILITY OF, AND SUCCESS IN ADOPTING A LOW-FAT DIET IN CORONARY PATIENTSJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2000
- Neuro-optometric facilitation of vision recovery after acquired brain injuryNeuroRehabilitation, 1998
- Outcome of Low Vision Aid Provision: The Effectiveness of a Low Vision ClinicOptometry and Vision Science, 1994
- Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacementPerception & Psychophysics, 1993
- Correction of Presbyopia with Contact Lenses: Comparative Success Rates with Three SystemsOptometry and Vision Science, 1989
- Normative Data for Ninety-Three Elderly Persons on the Schenkenberg Line Bisection TestPhysical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics, 1985
- Adaptation to split-field wedge prism spectacles.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969