Refusal to compromise: The case of earth first!
- 30 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Western Journal of Speech Communication
- Vol. 54 (4) , 473-494
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319009374356
Abstract
This qualitative case study examines Earth First!, a radical environmental group whose motto is “No Compromise in the Defense of Mother Earth!” The group creates controversy by engaging in guerilla theater, civil disobedience, and specific acts of private property destruction, variously labeled “monkeywrenching,” “ecotage,” or “ecodefense.” Earth First! texts use paradox, satire, contradiction, parody, and irony to desecrate or recontextualize unfavorable contexts. The larger environmental movement suffers and benefits as a result. Compromise is shown to be a matter of context and perspective.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speaking itself: Susan Sontag's town hall addressQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1989
- The rhetorical construction of institutional authority in a senate subcommittee hearing on wilderness legislationWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 1988
- The new Christian right and the humanist response: Reciprocated diatribeCommunication Quarterly, 1987
- Between text and context: Toward a rhetoric of contextual reconstructionQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1985
- The die is cast: Topical and ontological dimensions of thelocusof the irreparableQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1982
- An Analysis of Conflict Resolution TechniquesJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1982
- The transformation of the “old feminist” movementQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1981
- Movements: Confrontation as rhetorical formSouthern Speech Communication Journal, 1978
- Thoreau and civil disobedience: A rhetorical paradoxQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1974
- Power-Dependence RelationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1962