On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin..
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 112 (3) , 400-404
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
Abstract
It is noted that 7 of the 10 top-cited articles in the Psychological Bulletin deal with methodological topics. One of these is the Bentler-Bonett (1980) article on the assessment of fit in covariance structure models. Some context is provided on the popularity of this article. In addition, a citation study of methodology articles appearing in the Bulletin since 1978 was carried out. It verified that publications in design, evaluation, measurement, and statistics continue to be important to psychological research. Some thoughts are offered on the role of the journal in making developments in these areas more accessible to psychologists.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Cognition and the corpus callosum: Verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions.Behavioral Neuroscience, 1992
- Annotated bibliography of structural equation modelling: Technical workBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1991
- Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: A clarification.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Mediators and moderators in meta-analysis: There's a reason we don't let dodo birds tell us which psychotherapies should have prizes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991
- Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rationale based on precision.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Interrelations Among Models For The Analysis Of Moment StructuresMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1979
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979