Hypermutable Non-Synonymous Sites Are under Stronger Negative Selection
Open Access
- 28 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Genetics
- Vol. 4 (11) , e1000281
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000281
Abstract
Mutation rate varies greatly between nucleotide sites of the human genome and depends both on the global genomic location and the local sequence context of a site. In particular, CpG context elevates the mutation rate by an order of magnitude. Mutations also vary widely in their effect on the molecular function, phenotype, and fitness. Independence of the probability of occurrence of a new mutation's effect has been a fundamental premise in genetics. However, highly mutable contexts may be preserved by negative selection at important sites but destroyed by mutation at sites under no selection. Thus, there may be a positive correlation between the rate of mutations at a nucleotide site and the magnitude of their effect on fitness. We studied the impact of CpG context on the rate of human–chimpanzee divergence and on intrahuman nucleotide diversity at non-synonymous coding sites. We compared nucleotides that occupy identical positions within codons of identical amino acids and only differ by being within versus outside CpG context. Nucleotides within CpG context are under a stronger negative selection, as revealed by their lower, proportionally to the mutation rate, rate of evolution and nucleotide diversity. In particular, the probability of fixation of a non-synonymous transition at a CpG site is two times lower than at a CpG site. Thus, sites with different mutation rates are not necessarily selectively equivalent. This suggests that the mutation rate may complement sequence conservation as a characteristic predictive of functional importance of nucleotide sites. Mutations occur in some sites in the genome more frequently than in others. Similarly, mutations in some sites have greater consequences than in others. The effect of mutations might not be independent of the frequency with which mutations occur. Indeed, sites where mutations happen frequently will be preserved if the effects of these mutations are severe or will otherwise be allowed to mutate if there are no consequences for the organism. We compared both human–chimpanzee differences and sequence variation among humans in protein coding genes. We found that highly mutable nucleotide sites, such as the dinucleotide CpG, are on average more important and more frequently preserved by natural selection. Using this information, together with other features such as sequence conservation, opens a new perspective to predict the effect of human mutations, including their potential involvement in diseases.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the Evolutionary Impact of Amino Acid Mutations in the Human GenomePLoS Genetics, 2008
- Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genomeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Most Rare Missense Alleles Are Deleterious in Humans: Implications for Complex Disease and Association StudiesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2007
- The Strength of Selection on Ultraconserved Elements in the Human GenomeAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2007
- Higher Intensity of Purifying Selection on >90% of the Human Genes Revealed by the Intrinsic Replacement Mutation RatesMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2006
- Selection in favor of nucleotides G and C diversifies evolution rates and levels of polymorphism at mammalian synonymous sitesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2006
- Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammalsNature Reviews Genetics, 2006
- Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genomeNature, 2004
- The UCSC Genome Browser DatabaseNucleic Acids Research, 2003
- Genomewide Comparison of DNA Sequences between Humans and ChimpanzeesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2002