Cost Comparison of Immediat Angioplasty Versus Thrombolysis Followed by Conservative Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Prospective Trial
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Vol. 69 (1) , 5-12
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61604-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Cost-effectiveness perspectives in coronary heart diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- Measuring costs and financial benefits in randomized controlled trialsAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- The design of future cost-benefit studiesAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- Medical costs of coronary artery disease in the United StatesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Methodologic issues in policy modeling for cardiovascular diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Comparison of Invasive and Conservative Strategies after Treatment with Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient management alternatives after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: A modelJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Comparative cost of myocardial revascularization: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgeryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Is Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Less Expensive Than Bypass Surgery?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984