A Different Kind of Snowball: Identifying Key Policymakers
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Social Research Methodology
- Vol. 8 (4) , 345-353
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000203116
Abstract
Studying policy networks raises challenges in three important areas: identifying members of the policy network, gaining access to the network, and reporting findings from the study while maintaining confidentiality. Using the tobacco control policy and health policy networks in Victoria, Australia as a case study, the article describes how to use a reputational snowball to identify a policy network. I argue that the reputational snowball not only presents a useful tool for identifying micro‐level network members, but also provides a means for assessing which members of the policy network are core, and which ones are on the periphery. Issues around reporting in studies of policy influentials are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Getting Beyond the ‘Official Line’: Reflections on Dilemmas of Access, Knowledge and Power in Researching Policy NetworksJournal of Social Policy, 2002
- Hard Times on 125th Street: Harlem's Poor Confront Welfare ReformAmerican Anthropologist, 2001
- Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical ApproachPolitical Studies, 2000
- Medicine, economics and agenda-settingSocial Science & Medicine, 1998
- Making Up the Government's Mind: Agenda Setting in a Parliamentary SystemGovernance, 1998
- Policy Agendas of the Poor, the Public and Elites: A Test of Bachrach and BaratzAustralian Journal of Political Science, 1996
- Agenda-Setters and Policy Influentials: Results from the Victorian Agendas ProjectAustralian Journal of Political Science, 1996
- Policy Networks in British GovernmentPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- Snowball SamplingThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1961