Artificial Agents Learn Policies for Multi-Issue Negotiation
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Electronic Commerce
- Vol. 1 (4) , 49-88
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1997.11518295
Abstract
A well-established body of research consistently shows that people involved in multiple-issue negotiations frequently select Pareto-inferior agreements that "leave money on the table." Using an evolutionary computation approach, we show how simple, boundedly rational, artificial, adaptive agents can learn to negotiate effectively in stylized business negotiations. Furthermore, there is the promise that these agents can be integrated into practicable electronic commerce systems that not only would leave less money on the table, but would enable new types of transactions to be negotiated cost effectively.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Automated Discovery of Models Using Genetic Programming: Bargaining in a Three-Agent Coalitions GameJournal of Management Information Systems, 1995
- An empirical study of an interactive, session-oriented computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS)Group Decision and Negotiation, 1995
- Framing Effects and the Distributive Aspect of Integrative BargainingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- The Judgment Policies of Negotiators and the Structure of Negotiation ProblemsManagement Science, 1991
- Genetic algorithms approach to a negotiation support systemIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1991
- Money as a medium of exchange in an economy with artificially intelligent agentsJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1990
- Bargaining with Incomplete Information: An Infinite-Horizon Model with Two-Sided UncertaintyThe Review of Economic Studies, 1984
- Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining ProblemEconometrica, 1975
- Two-Person Cooperative GamesEconometrica, 1953
- The Bargaining ProblemEconometrica, 1950