Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in ovarian carcinomas: possibilities and limitations of both techniques
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
- Vol. 122 (1) , 7-12
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(00)00263-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: General amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primerPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999
- Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisationNucleic Acids Research, 1999
- Laser Capture Microdissection: Molecular Analysis of TissueScience, 1997
- Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridizationGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1997
- Mapping of chromosomal gains and losses in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridizationGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1995
- Gene amplification elucidated by combined chromosomal microdissection and comparative genomic hybridizationCancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, 1995
- Comparative genomic hybridization, allelic imbalance, and fluorescence in situ hybridization on chromosome 8 in prostate cancerGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1994
- Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumorsGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1994
- Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid TumorsScience, 1992