Determination of Free Serum Digoxin Concentrations in Digoxin Toxic Patients After Administration of Digoxin Fab Antibodies

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Digoxin fab antibody therapy is known to interfere with digoxin immunoassays causing spurious serum digoxin concentrations. The reliability and precision of three digoxin immunoassays--Baxter Dade Stratus (BDS), Syva affinity column enzyme-mediated immunoassay (EMIT), and the reference assay Abbott TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay following ultrafiltration (FPIA-UF)--were compared in eight digoxin toxic patients treated with digoxin fab antibodies. Five to eight blood samples were drawn serially up to 204 h post digoxin fab therapy. The serum digoxin concentration in each sample was determined by each of the three assays. The mean (+/- SD) area under the serum digoxin concentration-time curve was significantly lower for FPIA-UF than for BDS or EMIT (86.1 +/- 58.2 vs 158.1 +/- 88.6 and 176.3 +/- 115.3 h.ng/ml p less than 0.01, respectively). BDS correlated better with FPIA-UF (r2 = 0.71) than did EMIT (r2 = 0.45). Predictive performance of the BDS and EMIT assays demonstrated that the mean prediction error (bias) (0.62 vs 0.78 ng/ml) and the mean squared prediction error (precision) (0.48 vs 0.76) differed significantly from zero (p less than 0.05). However, BDS had significantly less bias and greater precision than did EMIT (p less than 0.05). In the presence of digoxin fab antibodies, BDS is a better predictor of free serum digoxin concentration than is EMIT, but both have considerable bias. Based on these results, FPIA-UF should be the assay of choice for determining free serum digoxin concentrations during fab therapy.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: