Effects of nonionic versus ionic contrast media on complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 67 (13) , 1046-1050
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90863-g
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular and Renal Toxicity of a Nonionic Radiographic Contrast Agent after Cardiac CatheterizationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography: Reduced incidence in man with contrast media lacking calcium binding additivesCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1985
- Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.Radiology, 1984
- Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): Advantages over standard ionic agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Coronary arteriography.Circulation, 1977
- Effects of contrast medium on left ventricular pressure and volume with emphasis on coronary artery diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 1977
- Reflex vasodilation induced by coronary angiography in human subjects.Circulation, 1976
- Mechanisms Mediating Bradycardia during Coronary ArteriographyJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1974
- Coronary Arteriography by the Single Catheter Percutaneous Femoral TechniqueCirculation, 1974
- Hemodynamic Consequences of the Injection of Radiopaque MaterialCirculation, 1965