The detection by serological methods of viruses infecting the rose

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
SUMMARY: Homogenates of herbaceous test plants infected with arabis mosaic virus (AMV), prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV), or strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRV), and purified virus preparations were used to assess the sensitivities of four serological methods (the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay ‐ ELISA, immunodiffusion in gels, the latex flocculation assay, and serologically specific electron microscopy ‐SSEM) for the detection of these viruses. The latex test was up to 250 times more sensitive than gel immunodiffusion, but SSEM and ELISA were respectively up to 1000 and 200 times more sensitive than the latex test.Gel immunodiffusion and latex tests failed to detect any of the viruses in infected roses. Although ELISA reliably detected PNRSV and SLRV when leaves from infected roses were homogenised in a leaf: buffer ratio of 1 g:10 ml, AMV was occasionally undetected. However, when a modified ELISA technique, which reduced non‐specific reactions, was used some PNRSV‐infected roses were also not detected. Detection by SSEM was c. twice as sensitive as ELISA for all three viruses in rose extracts. The relative advantages of ELISA and SSEM for the detection of plant viruses are discussed.