Measuring the Impostor Phenomenon: A Comparison of Clance's IP Scale and Harvey's I-P Scale
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment
- Vol. 60 (1) , 48-59
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_3
Abstract
Many of the discrepancies reported to date in empirical investigations of the impostor phenomenon (IP) may be due in part to (a) the use of different methods for identifying individuals suffering from this syndrome (impostors), (b) the common use of a median split procedure to classify subjects, and (c) the fact that subjects in many studies were drawn from impostor-prone samples. In this study, we compared the scores of independently identified impostors and nonimpostors on two instruments designed to measure the IP: Harvey's I-P Scale and Clance's IP Scale. The results suggest that Clance's scale may be the more sensitive and reliable instrument. Cutoff score suggestions for both instruments are offered.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring the Validity of the Impostor PhenomenonJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1990
- The Imposter PhenomenonWomen & Therapy, 1987
- A validation study of the Harvey Impostor Phenomenon Scale.Psychotherapy, 1987
- The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention.Psychotherapy, 1978