Factors that Influence the Value of the Coefficient of Determination in Simple Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Phytopathology®
- Vol. 77 (1) , 63-70
- https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-77-63
Abstract
In the fitting of linear regression equations, the coefficient of determination (R2) is one of the most widely used statistics to assess the goodness-of-fit of the equation. Its value, however, is affected by several factors, some of which are associated more closely with the data collection scheme or the experimental design than with how close the regression equation actually fits the observations. These design factors are: the range of values of the independent variable (X), the arrangement of X values within the range, the number of replicate observations (Y), and the variation among the Y values at each value of X. Another little-known fact is the effect on R2 of the ratio of the slope of the fitted equation to the estimated standard error of the observations. In nonlinear model fitting, the value of R2 is best determined by calculating the proportion of the total variation in the observations that cannot be explained by the fitted model and subtracting this proportion from one. Several statistics that are analogous to the standard formula for R2 in the linear regression case are given and determined to be inappropriate in the nonlinear case. The use of R2 alone as a model-fitting criterion is often risky and other statistics should be used to assess the goodness of the model when responses from quantitative treatments are analyzed by regression techniques.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative Comparison of the Resistance to Phytophthora Root Rot in Three Avocado RootstocksPhytopathology®, 1985
- Effects of Temperature on Sporulation, Conidial Germination, and Infection of Maize byPeronosclerospora sorghifrom Different Geographical AreasPhytopathology®, 1985
- Effects of Temperature and Relative Humidity on Sporangium Production ofPseudoperonospora humulion HopPhytopathology®, 1985
- Relationship Between Sclerotial Spatial Pattern and Density ofSclerotinia minorand the Incidence of Lettuce DropPhytopathology®, 1985
- Optimizing Plot Size for Field Studies of Phymatotrichum Root Rot of CottonPhytopathology®, 1985
- Influence of Temperature and Wetness Duration on Infection of Immature Strawberry Fruit byPhytophthora cactorumPhytopathology®, 1985
- Relationship Between Yield Loss and Severity of Early and Late Leafspot Diseases of PeanutPhytopathology®, 1984
- Applicability of the Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire in a Low-Income PopulationPediatrics, 1983
- Comparison of the Gompertz and Logistic Equations to Describe Plant Disease ProgressPhytopathology®, 1981
- A Loss Model for CropsPhytopathology®, 1981