Influence of type of prosthesis on late results after combined mitral-aortic valve replacement
- 31 July 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 52 (1) , 84-91
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(91)91425-u
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality after Cardiac Valvular OperationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Performance of the Hancock Porcine Bioprosthesis Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Considerations Based on a 15-Year ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Long-term Durability of the Hancock Porcine Bioprosthesis Following Combined Mitral and Aortic Valve Replacement: An 11-Year ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1987
- Clinical and necropsy observations early after simultaneous replacement of the mitral and aortic valvesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Isolated Mitral Valve Replacement with the Hancock Bioprosthesis: A 13-Year AppraisalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1984
- Combined aortic and mitral valve replacement: changes in practice and prognosis.Circulation, 1984
- Present Status of Prosthetic Cardiac ValvesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1983
- The Björk-Shiley valveThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1981
- Current status of cardiac valve replacement: Selection of a prosthesis and indications for operationAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Combined mitral and aortic valve diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1970