Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Vol. 11 (2) , 89-99
- https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200303000-00003
Abstract
Implant design and positioning are important factors in maintaining stability and minimizing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of modular femoral stems and acetabular implants increased the number of head, neck, and liner designs, the features of recent designs caKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dislocation after total hip arthroplastyOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 2001
- Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in EnglandThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1999
- Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer‐aided design simulationJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1998
- Joint Motion And Surface Contact Area Related To Component Position In Total Hip ArthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1997
- Dislocations in total hip arthroplasty—with special reference to registration, predisposing factors and prognoses for recurrencyActa Orthopaedica, 1996
- Can simple radiographs be predictive of total hip dislocation?The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995
- Surgeon work input and risk in primary versus revision total joint arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995
- Patient characteristics in dislocations after primary total hip arthroplasty:60 patients compared with a control groupActa Orthopaedica, 1995
- Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty: The impact of modular head-neck componentsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1991
- Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty Causes and PreventionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1990