Impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus active surveillance program on contact precaution utilization in a surgical intensive care unit*
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (2) , 430-434
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000253813.98431.28
Abstract
To determine the impact of an active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on contact precaution utilization, as measured by additional number of contact precaution days attributable to the active surveillance program. Prospective cohort study. Twenty-four-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU). All patients admitted to the surgical ICU. Nasal cultures for MRSA were performed at admission to a surgical ICU for 19 months. Patients admitted >48 hrs also received weekly and discharge nasal cultures. Clinical data, including start date and initial indication for contact precautions, were prospectively collected. Of 1,893 admissions, 253 (13%) were found to be MRSA-positive during their ICU stay. One hundred forty-six (58%) were identified by nasal culture alone. Compared with the first 10 months of study, the prevalence of MRSA on admission to the ICU during the last 9 months of the study period significantly increased (7.2% vs. 11.4%, p < .001). Acquisition of MRSA by noncolonized patients remained constant between the first 10 months and last 9 months of study (7.0 vs. 5.5 cases per 1000 patient days, p = .29). Two hundred fourteen (6%) of 3461 total contact precaution days in the ICU were attributable to MRSA active surveillance. In sensitivity analyses, the implementation of rapid, same-day results for MRSA active surveillance would increase contact precaution days by 15% compared with no surveillance. If the total number of vancomycin-resistant enterococci patients in the ICU were reduced by 50%, the contact precaution days attributable to active surveillance would increase to 9%. MRSA active surveillance increased total contact precaution days in this ICU by 6% yet detected 58% of MRSA cases that would have been otherwise missed. Despite an increasing prevalence of MRSA on admission to the ICU, the acquisition rate has remained constant.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004American Journal of Infection Control, 2004
- Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin Europe, 1999–2002Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Safety of Patients Isolated for Infection ControlJAMA, 2003
- Contact isolation in surgical patients: A barrier to care?Surgery, 2003
- Infection Control — A Problem for Patient SafetyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The Economic Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian HospitalsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2001
- Adverse effects of contact isolationThe Lancet, 1999
- Environmental Contamination Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Possible Infection Control ImplicationsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997
- Effectiveness of Contact Isolation during a Hospital Outbreak of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureusAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1991