North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 96 (5) , 537-544
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03252.x
Abstract
Summary. In a trial conducted at the North Staffordshire and Billinge Maternity Hospitals (NSMH and BMH) a total of 264 women who required an assisted delivery in the second stage of labour were randomly assigned to be delivered either by Kobayashi silicone cup ventouse or by forceps. A larger proportion (90%) of those assigned to the forceps group were actually delivered by the allocated instrument compared to those in the silicone cup group (73%). However, there was a significantly higher rate of maternal morbidity in terms of perineal trauma and discomfort in the forceps group. No differences in neonatal morbidity were detected.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multicentre randomized trial comparing delivery with a silicone rubber cup and rigid metal vacuum extractor cupsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Forceps or Vacuum Extraction? A Comparison of Effects on the Newborn InfantActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- Comparison Between the Conventional Malmström Extractor and a New Extractor with Silastic CupActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- COHORT STUDY OF SILASTIC OBSTETRIC VACUUM CUP DELIVERIES .1. SAFETY OF THE INSTRUMENT1985
- SOFT CUP VACUUM EXTRACTION - A COMPARISON OF OUTLET DELIVERY1985
- CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT OF THE KOBAYASHI VACUUM EXTRACTOR1984
- Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- COMPARISON OF MATERNAL AND FETAL EFFECTS OF VACUUM EXTRACTION WITH FORCEPS OR CESAREAN DELIVERIES1981