Inactivation of aPKCλ Reveals a Context Dependent Allocation of Cell Lineages in Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
Open Access
- 21 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 4 (9) , e7117
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007117
Abstract
During mammalian preimplantation development, lineage divergence seems to be controlled by the interplay between asymmetric cell division (once cells are polarized) and positional information. In the mouse embryo, two distinct cell populations are first observed at the 16-cell stage and can be distinguished by both their position (outside or inside) and their phenotype (polarized or non-polarized). Many efforts have been made during the last decade to characterize the molecular mechanisms driving lineage divergence. In order to evaluate the importance of cell polarity in the determination of cell fate we have disturbed the activity of the apical complex aPKC/PAR6 using siRNA to down-regulate aPKCλ expression. Here we show that depletion of aPKCλ results in an absence of tight junctions and in severe polarity defects at the 16-cell stage. Importantly, we found that, in absence of aPKCλ, cell fate depends on the cellular context: depletion of aPKCλ in all cells results in a strong reduction of inner cells at the 16-cell stage, while inhibition of aPKCλ in only half of the embryo biases the progeny of aPKCλ defective blastomeres towards the inner cell mass. Finally, our study points to a role of cell shape in controlling cell position and thus lineage allocation. Our data show that aPKCλ is dispensable for the establishment of polarity at the 8-cell stage but is essential for the stabilization of cell polarity at the 16-cell stage and for cell positioning. Moreover, this study reveals that in addition to positional information and asymmetric cell divisions, cell shape plays an important role for the control of lineage divergence during mouse preimplantation development. Cell shape is able to influence both the type of division (symmetric or asymmetric) and the position of the blastomeres within the embryo.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cdc42 and Par proteins stabilize dynamic adherens junctions in the Drosophila neuroectoderm through regulation of apical endocytosisThe Journal of cell biology, 2008
- Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and specification of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryoGenes & Development, 2008
- Moesin and its activating kinase Slik are required for cortical stability and microtubule organization in mitotic cellsThe Journal of cell biology, 2008
- Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryoDevelopment, 2007
- Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesisNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2007
- Analysis of aPKCλ and aPKCζ reveals multiple and redundant functions during vertebrate retinogenesisMolecular and Cellular Neuroscience, 2007
- Asymmetric distribution of PAR proteins in the mouse embryo begins at the 8-cell stage during compactionDevelopmental Biology, 2005
- Contribution of JAM-1 to epithelial differentiation and tight-junction biogenesis in the mouse preimplantation embryoJournal of Cell Science, 2004
- aPKC kinase activity is required for the asymmetric differentiation of the premature junctional complex during epithelial cell polarizationJournal of Cell Science, 2002
- Alternative routes for the establishment of surface polarity during compaction of the mouse embryoDevelopmental Biology, 1989