Successful Takeovers without Exclusion
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 1 (1) , 89-110
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.89
Abstract
While most takeover models assume atomistic stockholders, we analyze a single-raider model with finitely many stockholders. Because the raider can always make some stockholders pivotal, he can overcome the free-rider problem identified by Grossman and Hart (1980) and others in atomistic-stockholder models and profitably take over even without exclusion. One might expect that it would be harder for the raider to make stockholders of more widely held firms pivotal and that exclusion would thus become necessary; however, the infinite-stockholder game cannot yield this conclusion. We also consider the limit of the finite-stockholder game and give conditions under which exclusion is unnecessary. Finally, we show that exclusion leads to the possibility of inefficient takeovers.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Large Shareholders and Corporate ControlJournal of Political Economy, 1986
- Defensive Stock RepurchasesHarvard Law Review, 1986
- The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and ConsequencesJournal of Political Economy, 1985
- Toward Undistorted Choice and Equal Treatment in Corporate TakeoversHarvard Law Review, 1985
- The law of large numbers with a continuum of IID random variablesJournal of Economic Theory, 1985
- Continuum and Finite-Player Noncooperative Models of CompetitionEconometrica, 1984
- A strategic calculus of votingPublic Choice, 1983
- Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium ConceptPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the CorporationThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1980
- Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate ControlThe Journal of Business, 1980