Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation
Open Access
- 29 October 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 34 (5) , 1595-1601
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00363-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.Heart, 1989
- Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: The importance of phasic durationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.Circulation, 1985
- Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.Circulation, 1984
- Ventricular Defibrillation — A Comparative Trial Using 175-J and 320-J ShocksNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Ventricular defibrillation: appropriate energy levels.Circulation, 1979