Interpretations of Nonstress Tests by Obstetric Nurses
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
- Vol. 19 (3) , 227-232
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01641.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTICAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- Antepartum testing: A challenge for nursingThe Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 1987
- Electronic fetal monitoring: Practices and protocols for the intrapartum patientThe Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 1987
- Historical perspective on electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: A decade of growth, a decade of conflictThe Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 1987
- Interpretation of nonstress testsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracingsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocogramsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Predictive value of, and observer variability in, several ways of reporting antepartum cardiotocographsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982