Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single‐participant and jackknife‐based scoring methods
Top Cited Papers
- 8 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psychophysiology
- Vol. 45 (2) , 250-274
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x
Abstract
We used computer simulations to evaluate different procedures for measuring changes in the onset latency of a representative range of event-related components (the auditory and visual N1, P3, N2pc, and the frequency-related P3 difference wave). These procedures included several techniques to determine onset latencies combined with approaches using both single-participant average waveforms and jackknife-subsample average waveforms. In general, the jackknife-based approach combined with the relative criterion technique or combined with the fractional area technique (J.C. Hansen & S.A. Hillyard, 1980; S.J. Luck, 2005) provided the most accurate method and the greatest statistical power, with no inflation of Type I error rate.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentialsNeuropsychologia, 2007
- Long-term electrophysiological changes in athletes with a history of multiple concussionsBrain Injury, 2007
- Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2007
- Latent inhibition mediates N1 attenuation to repeating soundsPsychophysiology, 2004
- The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivityElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1996
- P300 differences between sinistrals and dextralsCognitive Brain Research, 1995
- Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1988
- Surprise!… Surprise?Psychophysiology, 1981
- The Jackknife--A ReviewBiometrika, 1974
- Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human BrainScience, 1973