Organizational Research and the Praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organizational Research Methods
- Vol. 5 (1) , 56-80
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102051005
Abstract
This commentary explores the assumptions, concepts, objectives, labels, and empirical techniques that underpin, guide, and characterize the research approach and methodology of Pierre Bourdieu. To further understand his approach and its applicability in the context of organization studies, Bourdieu’s general project is contrasted with historical materialism and his view of power briefly compared to that of Foucault. Furthermore, Bourdieu’s concepts of field, capital, habitus, doxa, and symbolic violence, and his understanding of language are linked to current organizational literature and theory. His focus on relational analysis, “reflexivity,” and what the author refers to as the “construction of the research object” are similarly discussed. Finally, there is a consideration of the role of the researcher and a brief discussion of the implications and limitations of a Bourdieun approach.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inter‐organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional FieldsJournal of Management Studies, 2000
- What the Social Text affair does and does not proveCritical Quarterly, 1998
- Bourdieu and Foucault on power and modernityPhilosophy & Social Criticism, 1996
- Book ReviewsDiscourse & Society, 1993
- Principles of Critical Discourse AnalysisDiscourse & Society, 1993
- Appropriating Bourdieu: Feminist Theory and Pierre Bourdieu's Sociology of CultureNew Literary History, 1991
- Reflexivity, Recursion and Social Life: Elements for a Postmodern SociologySociological Review, 1989
- Symbolic Violence and the Making of the French Agriculturalist: An Enquiry into Pierre Bourdieu's SociologyJournal of Sociology, 1987
- Reading Pierre BourdieuCultural Anthropology, 1986
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983