Cost-Effectiveness of Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: Results from the CHARISMA Trial
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 12 (6) , 872-879
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00529.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, or Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease in the CHARISMA TrialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- International Prevalence, Recognition, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Outpatients With AtherothrombosisJAMA, 2006
- Estimating Survival for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Case Study in AtherothrombosisValue in Health, 2004
- Clopidogrel added to aspirin versus aspirin alone in secondary prevention and high-risk primary prevention: Rationale and design of the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Early and Sustained Dual Oral Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJAMA, 2002
- Cost and Cost-effectiveness of an Early Invasive vs Conservative Strategy for the Treatment of Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2002
- Effects of Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes without ST-Segment ElevationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Health Databases in SaskatchewanPublished by Wiley ,2000