Sources of Variation of Commonly Measured Serum Analytes in 6 Asian Cities and Consideration of Common Reference Intervals
Open Access
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 54 (2) , 356-365
- https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.091843
Abstract
Background: In a previous study to determine the feasibility of common reference intervals in Asia, we found significant differences among populations from 6 cities. In this study, we attempted to define the sources of these differences. Methods: We enrolled 580 healthy volunteers (279 men, 301 women, 20–62 years old), after a selection process that was based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, and used a lifestyle questionnaire. All sera were obtained at a basal state and frozen at −80 °C until the collective assay was done. We measured 21 basic chemical analytes and 10 serum proteins. Results: We used 3-level nested ANOVA to separate the variation (SD) into between-city (SD-city), between-sex (SD-sex), between-age (SD-age), and between-individual (SD-indiv) components. SD-indiv corresponds to one-quarter of the “pure” reference interval obtained after removing variations due to city, sex, and age. The SD-sex to SD-indiv ratio was >0.8 for creatinine, urate, retinol-binding protein, and transthyretin. We observed high SD-city to SD-indiv ratios, ranging from 0.4 to 0.7, for 11 analytes including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), electrolytes, IgG, and complement components and SD-age to SD-indiv ratios >0.4 for LDH, alkaline phosphatase, and total cholesterol. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated several other relevant sources of variation, including body mass index, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking, although their contributions were generally smaller than those for sex, region, or age. Conclusion: We observed unacceptably large regional differences in measured values of some analytes even after adjustment for age, sex, and lifestyle variables. Genetic and environmental factors may account for the residual differences.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are the common reference intervals truly common? Case studies on stratifying biochemical reference data by countries using two partitioning methodsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2004
- Reference intervals for eight enzymes in blood of adult females and males measured in accordance with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference system at 37°C: part of the Nordic Reference Interval ProjectScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2004
- The Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000: recommended reference intervals for 25 common biochemical propertiesScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2004
- Descriptive analytical data and consequences for calculation of common reference intervals in the Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2004
- Serum protein standardization project in Japan: Evaluation of an IFCC reference material (RPPHS/CRM470) and establishment of reference intervalsJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 1997
- Determination of reference intervals for 13 plasma proteins based on IFCC international reference preparation (CRM470) and NCCLS proposed guideline (C28-P, 1992): A strategy for partitioning reference individuals with validation based on multivariate analysisJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 1997