Insecticide‐treated cattle for tsetse control: the power and the problems

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Trypanosomiasis control increasingly involves financial input from livestock owners and their active participation. If control is carried out on smaller scales than in the past, methods such as aerial and ground spraying and sterile insect techniques will have reduced application. There will be increased reliance on trypanocidal drugs, and bait methods of tsetse control – where flies are attracted to point sources and killed. If drug resistance develops, cheap and simple bait methods offer the only means of disease control that might be applied, and paid for, by stockowners themselves. The methods have been effective in some circumstances, but not in others, and it is important to understand the reasons for the successes and the failures. Analysis is presented of the results of two Tanzanian tsetse control campaigns involving the use of insecticide‐treated cattle. Between 1991, &, 1996, following the introduction of widespread dipping in the Kagera Region, trypanosomiasis declined from > 19 000 cases to < 2400 and deaths from > 1000 to 29. On four ranches in the region, tsetse have been almost eliminated and trypanosomiasis prophylaxis is no longer used. Similarly aggressive use of pyrethroids on Mkwaja Ranch in Tanga Region has not had such dramatic effects. Tsetse and trypanosomiasis are still common, despite high levels of prophylaxis and the deployment of ≈ 200 odour‐baited targets. The difference in the results is attributed to a combination of the much smaller area covered by treated animals at Mkwaja, a greater susceptibility to re‐invasion and a more suitable habitat for the flies. A better understanding of the dynamics of the use of insecticide‐treated cattle is needed before we can predict confidently the outcome of particular control operations.